Search Special Collections
Results
Total number of records: 18
Truth's defence against the refined subtility of the serpent, held forth in divers answers to several queries, made by men (called ministers) in the north
Fox, George (1624-1691); Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662)
1653
Wing F1970; Smith I, 646.
The rebukes of a reviler fallen upon his own head, in an answer to a book put forth by one John Stelham... Wherein is shewed unto all spiritual men, that he himself is justly proved to be a contradictor of the scriptures
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662); Burrough, Edward (1634-1662)
1657
Initials of Edward Burrough, p. 75.
An answer to a declaration put forth by the general consent of the people called Anabaptists, in and about the city of London. Which declaration doth rather seem a begging of pardon of the Caveliers, then [sic] a vindication of that truth and cause once contended for
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662); Burrough, Edward (1634-1662)
1659
"The Baptists in their Postscript for a confirmation of a seal to their confusion, they have subscribed these names following, viz. Henry Jessey... [et al.]". "An answer to a declaration of the peop...
Liberty of conscience asserted, and several reasons rendred [sic], why no outward force, nor imposition, ought to be used in matters of faith and religion : with several sayings, collected from the speeches and writings of King James, and King Charles the First
Crook, John (1617-1699); Fisher, Samuel (1605-1665); Howgill, Francis (1618-1669); Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662)
1661
Indexed in: Wing L1960; Smith I, 485.
Persecution inconsistant with Christianity, humane society, and the honour of princes. From the testimonies of themselves, and approved authors, and martyrs, herein impartially collected. Whereto is added certain solid reasons why no outward force, nor imposition out to be used in matters of faith, &c....eby ... Richard Hubberthorn, Samuel Fisher, Francis Howgill
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662); Crook, John (1617-1699); Fisher, Samuel (1605-1665); Howgill, Francis (1618-1669)
1670
Reasons for liberty of conscience (p. 22-29) originally published, 1661, with title: Liberty of conscience asserted / written by J. Crook, S. Fisher, F. Howgill & R. Huberthorn. Page [32] is blank. ...
The testimony of the everlasting gospel, witnessed through sufferings
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662); Lancaster, James; Atkinson, Christopher Quaker
1654
Hubberthorne named, p.3; Lancaster, p.5; Atkinson, p.8. By Richard Hubberthorne, James Lancaster and Christopher Atkinson.
Truth's defence against the refined subtility of the serpent, held forth in divers answers to several queries, made by men (called ministers) in the north
Fox, George (1624-1691); Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662)
1653
Wing F1970; Smith I, 646.
The difference of that call of God to the ministry: which is by the power of his own gift and measure of life, revealed, and of that, which is received of man, and taught by man, as is manifest by these two severall calls, herein declared, with several principals relating to this second call, answered
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662)
1659
Indexed in: Wing H3223; Smith I, 1013.
The immediate call to the ministery of the gospel, witnessed by the spirit : with a true declaration of the persecution and suffering of Richard Hubberthorne, James Parnell, Ann Blayling, by Will. Pickering, who is mayor of Cambridge. Also an answer to divers letters and mittimusses, against the said prisoners, answered
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662); Parnell, James (1637?-1656)
1654
Indexed in: Wing H3225; Smith I, 1011.
A reply to a book set forth by one of the blind guides of England who is a priest at Barwick Hall in Lancashire, who writes his name R. Sherlock, Batcheler of Divinity, but he is proved to be a diviner and deceiver of the people. Which book is in answer to some queres set forth to him by them whom he calls Quakers. And herein are replies given to his answers, by those whom the world reproachfully calls Quakers
Hubberthorne, Richard (1628-1662)
1654
A reply to "The Quakers wilde questions objected against the minister of the gospel".