Skip to main content

Search Special Collections

Results

1 to 12 of 12 records

Total number of records: 12

Top 10: People and organisations

People and organisationsCount
Calverley, Sir Walter12
Hitch, Henry2
Wentworth, Sir William2
Stapylton, Sir Miles2
Stroother, Thomas1
Stapylton, Sir Miles & Thompson, Mr1
Turner, Mr1
Nevile, Cavendish1
[Unknown]1
Blackett, Sir William1

Sender: Stroother, Thomas

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 4

Date(s): 4 Mar 1731 - 28 Mar 1734

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/1-2, 5, 8

Note: 1) On possible methods of stamping the cloth. 2) Elaborating the ideas expressed in the previous letter. 3) About several petitions that are being organised. 4) On the progress of the Bill through the Lords.

Sender: Wentworth, Sir William

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 3

Date(s): 6 Feb [1733] - 28 Mar 1741

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/4, 15, 22

Note: 1) Assuring him he will support the Cloth Bill in the House. 2) On the abuses of the present regulations, and advocating the passing of the new bill. 3) Reporting the passing of the Cloth Act.

Sender: Blackett, Sir William

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 1

Date(s): 17 Apr 1733

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/6

Note: Reporting that the Cloth Act will probably be renewed without the restraining clause.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: Wentworth, Sir William

Letters: 1

Date(s): 5 Feb [1734]

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/7

Note: Commenting on and opposing attempts by the clothiers to have the Act altered so that the millmen are not paid for stamping the cloth. Contemporary copy.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: Stapylton, Sir Miles

Letters: 2

Date(s): 27 Jan 1740 - 8 Mar 1740

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/12, 15

Note: 1) Suggesting that the cloth should be stamped at the mills by

the searchers. Contemporary copy. Unsigned. 2) On the abuses

of the present regulations, and advocating the passing of the

new bill.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: Stapylton, Sir Miles & Thompson, Mr

Letters: 1

Date(s): 20 Feb 1740

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/13

Note: Draft of a letter suggesting that the present penalties are too

high and that there should be a General Supervisor of the searchers. On verso is another draft, deleted.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: Turner, Mr

Letters: 1

Date(s): 20 Feb 1740

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/14

Note: On the opposition he faced in 1732 when he tried to bring in a bill similar to the present one. Contemporary copy.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: Hitch, Henry

Letters: 1

Date(s): 8 Mar 1740

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/15

Note: On the abuses of the present regulations, and advocating the passing of the new bill.

Sender: Nevile, Cavendish

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 2

Date(s): 21 Mar 1740 - 31 Dec 1740

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/16, 18

Note: 1) Expressing the wish that Mr Stroother had not interfered in the Cloth Bill. 2) On turnpike roads, with an abridgement of what is desired to be obtained in Parliament for continuing or amending the expiring Cloth Act.

Sender: Hitch, Henry

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 5

Date(s): 14 Mar [1741] - 26 Jul [1741]

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/20-21, 23-24, 26

Note: 1) On the progress of the Cloth Bill. 2) On the progress of the Cloth Bill. 3) Regretting that ignorance of the trade and lack of time have not allowed a better Act to be framed. 4) Hoping to obtain a better Act in a year or two. 5) Informing him of his intended visit to Bradford.

Sender: Stapylton, Sir Miles

Recipient: Calverley, Sir Walter

Letters: 1

Date(s): 24 Aug 1741

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/27

Note: On Hitch's duplicity concerning the clause which would prevent

millowners from adjudicating in disputes about cloth. Defective.

Sender: Calverley, Sir Walter

Recipient: [unknown]

Letters: 2

Date(s): [c. 1740 ?]

Location: SC Calverley Papers: MS 301/31, 33

Note: 1) About the abuses of the present system of stamping cloth. 2) About the opinion of the merchants on stamping the cloth. Defective.